On: Binance outflows hit $6B as Mazars halts ‘proof of...

[JumpCrisscross]

> downvoted for suggesting a company might be solvent

The comment said they are solvent. Not that they might be. Given the present facts and circumstances, that’s unfounded. (EDIT: Never mind.)

[Lerc → JumpCrisscross]

No they didn't. The "5)" was indicating a further option. That is very much a suggestion and not a statement of fact.

[JumpCrisscross → Lerc]

Fair enough. It’s a remote possibility for a company with literally no known legal structure and under criminal investigation in multiple jurisdictions, but sometimes unicorns fart rainbows.

[totalZero → JumpCrisscross]

> Possibilities:

The comment said the fifth possibility is that they are solvent.

[danaris → JumpCrisscross]

The comment said that Tether is solvent.

I do not believe this is sufficiently well-proven to be something we can take as a given.