I'd still rather google these questions. you get the same material (google+gpt3 scraping+processing the same internet), but a choice of how its presented - a video, a "ELI5" explanation, an animated illustration, the comprehensive treatment on a Wikipedia page, etc.
And you are learning from a person, in a community, etc. Potential of beginning to belong to something as you learn. And be pointed to other contexts, other perspectives, other bodies of related learning.
And less of a queasy feeling about accuracy, since you know the source a bit better. Hard to be a critical reader with gpt3, anything it says is suspect to a degree.
No reason gpt3 can't foster this kind of thing, by citing sources etc. But it does run the risk of biting the hand that feeds it. If the summaries are good enough, fewer people rewarding ppl building websites to provide sharing of knowledge ...
And you are learning from a person, in a community, etc. Potential of beginning to belong to something as you learn. And be pointed to other contexts, other perspectives, other bodies of related learning.
And less of a queasy feeling about accuracy, since you know the source a bit better. Hard to be a critical reader with gpt3, anything it says is suspect to a degree.
No reason gpt3 can't foster this kind of thing, by citing sources etc. But it does run the risk of biting the hand that feeds it. If the summaries are good enough, fewer people rewarding ppl building websites to provide sharing of knowledge ...