If exercise reduced risk of dementia by 99% would you still feel compelled to point out that it "doesn't appear to be the singular cause of increased wellness"?
Where's your threshold?
We literally have the solution. What you're saying, while it is technically true, seems to be more of an excuse or justification not to exercise. Perhaps I'm reading too much into your comment.
I think you are reading into it too much, but I think you also might be missing that fit people may tend to make a LOT of different decisions in life than less fit people.
This is something I’ve been digging deep into and discovering a lot of seemingly safe assumptions turn out not to be.
I do expect exercise is a major factor here (perhaps the largest), but I’m acutely aware lately that these things, especially where nutrition could be a significant factor, are rarely ever cut and dry. It’s incredibly complex.
I don’t mean to say people shouldn’t exercise. I should have emphasized that, without a doubt. We know beyond any shadow of doubt that it improves quality of life dramatically for virtually everyone.
Correlation is not causation. Even if exercise were associated with a 99% risk reduction, it could remain the case that people who are prone to Alzheimer's are less motivated to exercise early in life rather than the exercise preventing Alzheimer's later in life. There are plenty of other good reasons to exercise, we don't have to stretch this one beyond what the data says.
If exercise reduced risk of dementia by 99% would you still feel compelled to point out that it "doesn't appear to be the singular cause of increased wellness"?
Where's your threshold?
We literally have the solution. What you're saying, while it is technically true, seems to be more of an excuse or justification not to exercise. Perhaps I'm reading too much into your comment.