Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's also confusing... I mean, what does "non-production use" mean anyway? Does it mean "non-commercial use"? Or "testing/debug/staging environment"? Or "does not produce any valuable output"...?



According to this article https://perens.com/2017/02/14/bsl-1-1/ about the Business Source License, the intention conveyed by the word "production" for that license is use "in any capacity that is meant to make money".


> "in any capacity that is meant to make money"

I'll note that that's the definition of "commercial".


What I want to know is: "can I add Codon to a site like https://cocalc.com that I host as long as users of Codon explicitly agree to only use it in a way that is compatible with the license?" I have absolutely no idea if that would be allowed by the rules or not.


I think that's supposed to apply to you, not your users. My understanding is that you pay if you make money using it. I can definitely see how you can easily interpret it in many other ways though.


It means if a company uses this program, they can't use it without paying the developer.


> It means if a company

”company” is not a particularly well-defined term.


But companies can still experiment with it without paying. IE, you can integrate it and run benchmarks to see if it would actually help your pain points.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: