I appreciate the link, but I can't tell if those number are per capita or just raw numbers.
It would make sense that bike numbers are smaller if they are just the raw numbers given that there are probably 100x more cyclists and 1000x more pedestrians than bikers.
If those numbers aren't adjusted for usage then it makes bikes look even more dangerous when you adjust for how often each form of travel is used.
It would make sense that bike numbers are smaller if they are just the raw numbers given that there are probably 100x more cyclists and 1000x more pedestrians than bikers.
If those numbers aren't adjusted for usage then it makes bikes look even more dangerous when you adjust for how often each form of travel is used.
As someone who commutes by bike, yikes!!