I feel that the massive scale of social media created a monster of social impact that human don't fully understand yet. The tremendous broadcasting effect that human had not experienced before needs further scrutiny for its impact positive and negative.
We have been practicing and advocating freedom of expression in the paradigm of news papers and TV, where the publishers are held accountable for editorial accountability. Or in the form of self-expression on the streets, or town square, where the impact of info/rumor/attach is much smaller than the current social media. One entity (a person or a bot) with millions of followers can spread info/rumor/attack.
It seems absurd that such huge scale of spreading information can be without accountability.
It's like that a society has to regulate automobile for its traffic accountability due to its much greater dangers to the society, but few or none for the horse-drawn carriage and the pedestrians.
I think that Twitter or other social media may have tiered censorship based the number of followers to limit it to be the appropriate human-scale of influence
We need to exam these issues in the context of social impact.
I think that Twitter or other social media may have tiered censorship based the number of followers to limit it to be the appropriate human-scale of influence
We need to exam these issues in the context of social impact.