> Initial funding for the group, launched in November 2019, included half a million dollars each from George Soros' Open Society Foundations and Charles Koch's Koch Foundation.
How is this “far right”? And are we really doing the “you’re an anti-Semite” act if you don’t agree with 100% of what AIPAC says?
Comparing your description to the content of the Wikipedia article I cannot help but feel that you're giving a biased summary, particularly by using the loaded term "far right" which is nowhere suggested in the article, and by bringing up the claims of anti-Semitism which appear to have been mostly based on their criticism of the USA's uncritical support for the state of Israel [0].
While some in the far right may sympathise with this foundation's non-interventionist approach, I don't think it's accurate to describe them as far right through guilt by association.
> Comparing your description to the content of the Wikipedia article I cannot help but feel that you're giving a biased summary
I directly linked to the section of the wiki article that says almost exactly what I said. Here's direct quotes for you:
> Cirincione said he "fundamentally" disagrees with Quincy experts who "completely ignore the dangers and the horrors of Russia’s invasion and occupation and focus almost exclusively on criticism of the United States, NATO, and Ukraine".
> describing it as an "isolationist, blame America First money pit for so-called scholars who've written that American foreign policy could be fixed if only it were rid of the malign influence of Jewish money."
> According to an April 2021 article in Tablet, two Quincy Institute fellows have cast doubt on whether the Chinese government's persecution of the Uyghur population amounts to a genocide.
