> it looks like you're slagging off this project rather than making a potentially valid argument for Macports over Homebrew.
It looks like you're personally attacking me rather than speaking to any argument I may have made.
> The project author probably chose Homebrew because they already knew how to use it, it works, and they were more interested in making their Quake port than with evaluating different package managers. People make these kinds of choices all the time, particularly with side projects where they only have limited time to work on them.
As I made no mention of the author nor the project, and no one but the author knows the reasons for their choices, this is a mind-reading fallacy wrapped in a straw man.
It looks like you're personally attacking me rather than speaking to any argument I may have made.
> The project author probably chose Homebrew because they already knew how to use it, it works, and they were more interested in making their Quake port than with evaluating different package managers. People make these kinds of choices all the time, particularly with side projects where they only have limited time to work on them.
As I made no mention of the author nor the project, and no one but the author knows the reasons for their choices, this is a mind-reading fallacy wrapped in a straw man.