Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This may be a stretch but I could see the original report coming from an intelligence service.

The report might be accompanied by a request to hold off on patching it due to active use.

This would explain the desire to wait on G's side, and why it would not explain the prior report.




And also why they patched it only when faced with exposure.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: