Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>there is no danger of closed private forks gaining any traction

grsec is a counter example to this claim




From Grsecurity FAQ:

> Grsecurity fully complies with the license of the Linux kernel, the GPLv2. Since grsecurity is delivered as a source code patch, it is not possible under the terms of the GPL to offer a free version under an actual restriction that it be used only for evaluation purposes. Any customer receiving a grsecurity patch receives all the GPL-granted rights and responsibilities, including the right to redistribute patches in their possession or even to sell them to others.

Forks are completely fine. A lot of hardware, often not even esoteric, is supported by non-mainline kernel versions.


It is closed because customers are incentivized to not share the patches so they can continue to receive new patches.


Customers are free to distribute the patches, Grsecurity is free to choose who their customers are.


I never implied that what they are doing is wrong or illegal. Just that it is a closed private fork.


Sure I just think that it is still open source, but I think we're on the same page.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: