Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

To be fair to the author, that quote is part of a longer passage about how one should not optimize for free form ascii first when fixed size buffers are an option. At least that how I read it, it's clearly opinionated writing.



That library was on HN a few times, and I read quite some discussions he was involved in.

He's a bit like Linus. He knows what's up and sees all the people around him building sub par software.

But instead of telling them how to improve, he's very confrontative and I think those times of gatekeeping are over.


> But instead of telling them how to improve

Gatekeeping implies that this author actually has something he can keep from you, like universities gatekeeping a certificate for intellectual credibility, or OpenAI saying that they have information that is too dangerous for the world. The personal refusal to acknowledge anyone for anything is only gatekeeping insofar as the public ought have some moral prerogative to that person's acknowledgment.

Why is this one author's acknowledgment so interesting that we should have a debate over it? In the face of all priorities, does this really bubble up to the top?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: