Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Most wealth tax proposals are to take a percentage of a person's accumulated wealth annually.

A property tax isn't what people are talking about for a wealth tax.

I do believe that you should be able to keep accumulated wealth. We are all equals under the law. Once there is a wealth tax the definition of wealthy will be continually decreased so the government can take more. The government has an insatiable appetite for spending other people's money. It will always demand more.




Property/land taxes are the best form of wealth tax, as its difficult to shift your land to another jurisdiction.


And those already exist. Which is why wealth tax proposals don't include property taxes.


In some places, yes. In other places they don't (or are incredibly small).

More generally, if you're going to tax wealth property is the place to start.


Like I said, that isn't what is bandied about as a wealth tax. Elizabeth Warren proposes a 2% annual tax for net worth over $50 million and 6% for over $1 billion. It is literally taking a percentage of what they own every year. Don't forget, they would still pay taxes when selling assets.

https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/ultra-millionaire-tax




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: