Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> role models are a necessity for young girls to be able to identify with someone in the field and the situation was so unbalanced something had to be done to seed the field.

Wrong. The problem is not that girls are unable to feel a connection with Newton or Fleming (Most genius lives are not orbiting around sex after all). This plan don't understands (or simply choose to ignore) how many woman were inspired to became scientists after a father figure, or because their (male) fathers were scientists yet.

The real problem is that the model of "scientist girl" must compete with other --feminine-- roles. Models that show ways much more efficient and easier to became a rich, successful and popular woman. Models that spend trucks of money to assure that young girls notice them. The scientist girl must compete with one hand tied to her back, because this society choose to reward more a woman able to sing and dance, than a woman able to do research.

This is mostly a problem of woman versus woman, not of woman versus man.




Iā€™m not pulling the lack of role models thing out of thin air. Your take goes against decades of research so I will posit that you are plain wrong.

My comment is now surrounded by bordering misogynistic comments. It makes me feel uncomfortable. Sorry to everyone for what I inadvertently unleashed.


> against decades of research

Probably decades of dubious, non-reproducible, sociological research, without a real idea of how things really are in the field. Is just another case of blinded by ideology.

As a zoologist, I am perfectly able to appreciate the work of Jane Goodall and what she achieved. I don't need a "Peter Goodall" at all. This is why science was great twenty years ago and not-so-great now.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: