I must have misunderstood you. I read it as you arguing that some people are lacking in recognition despite significant discoveries.
This is why I highlighted the The written goal of Wikipedia. It is not peoples achievement or work that qualify them for articles. It is the secondary sources that write about people that qualify those people for articles, regardless if those people deserve it or not.
If there is a lot of secondary sources then there should very likely be an article. That is after all the purpose of Wikipedia.
This is why I highlighted the The written goal of Wikipedia. It is not peoples achievement or work that qualify them for articles. It is the secondary sources that write about people that qualify those people for articles, regardless if those people deserve it or not.
If there is a lot of secondary sources then there should very likely be an article. That is after all the purpose of Wikipedia.