Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Which I honestly find pretty reasonable. If you were to make a Wikipedia article for every college professor, we'd have a pretty bloated Wikipedia

Why would that be a problem? What is such a Long Tail costing us? It's not like there is scarcity like a libraries' bookshelves or pages in a journal.

And what would be the line of bloatedness? Maybe it already is way too bloated, and a wikipedia 10% the current size is better?




>Why would that be a problem?

I imagine it would be harder to navigate, especially in a few decades, if every combination of First name, Last name had a couple entries. There's already 7 for my name. Sure, you could say its not that much harder to navigate... but you can't say it makes things easier or "better."

I would honestly defer to Wiki contributors and maintainers on this, as I'm sure they have better reasons... but my intuition just tells me that letting Wikipedia be a dumping ground for any person that published a paper would just not end well.

>Maybe it already is way too bloated, and a wikipedia 10% the current size is better?

Perhaps. I think they should do a lot more "merging" of topics.


Why not have 8 billion entries for each and every one of us? If you remove any popularity boundary then this is the only logical conclusion


Names especially tend to cluster which makes signal harder to find in noise. Wikipedia is meant to be searchable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: