On: Wikipedia is not short on cash

[blululu]

There are laws against fine print for a reason. The front page pop up ad tells a different story than a stack of text heavy articles that require no small amount of technical expertise to figure out.

[jasonlotito → blululu]

They haven't broken any laws. And "text heavy articles" are bad now? They share this information, and it's very public.

Prove to me they are lying. Nothing on their donation page seems to be a lie.

Your comment on the other hand is very misleading.

[shadowgovt → blululu]

> The are laws against fine print for a reason

Has Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation broken any?