Is this not how DRM works ? If you support deliberately handicapped content distribution platforms with your money do not blame anyone else but yourself
Edit: more precisely playback of DRMed content requires the endpoint to provide the distributor with guarantees wrt content duplication. It works exactly the same with DRMed content in Firefox because ultimately Apple/Mozilla do not make decisions on what you can or cannot do, Amazon Prime dictates that you can only access content if you relinquish your rights to prtscr (that is - the DR in DRM), and you decided to access the content.
Amazon Prime video on macOS. I thought I could always count on Shift+Command+4. Imagine I'm talking to someone who is having a heart attack and want to send them a screenshot of a video with a bunch of tips on what to do. Shit like this really happens.
I do wonder what those “some cases” are, though, and also why we would want to not show a secure text field in a screen recording. Is giving away the length of your password deemed such a risk?
This is a case where the oxford comma would help remove ambiguity
I think it's supposed to list:
- disables copying
- (in some cases) prevents recording/broadcasting
- hides the text
Where "some cases" is simply some minimum iOS version and/or some other unknown hardware configuration that allows the device to prevent video recording
I don't think the comma usage was wrong. The commas around "and in some cases" serve as both serializing the list and inserting the extra information that otherwise could've been removed from the sentence. However, it might have been better to use parenthesis to avoid the ambiguity.
The use of parallel verbs "disables", "prevents", and "hides" was a strong indicator to me that it was a list. I interpreted the "and also" at the end as a stylistic choice since the first two items follows the form "[verb] [ing-verb]" whereas the last item doesn't.
The fact that you you recognize the termination of grammatical parallelism in the final phrase yet inject authorial intentions of style into your analysis thereof to interpret the sentence as yet another example of the moral decay in English orthography indicates to me I need to leave the internet forever.
TIL allowing objects after their respective parallel verbs to not follow the same form is considered moral decay of the English language
And yes, the internet is a silly place where we'd rather have an off-topic argument about the subtleties of grammar than wait for an iOS developer to resolve the original question
Edit: more precisely playback of DRMed content requires the endpoint to provide the distributor with guarantees wrt content duplication. It works exactly the same with DRMed content in Firefox because ultimately Apple/Mozilla do not make decisions on what you can or cannot do, Amazon Prime dictates that you can only access content if you relinquish your rights to prtscr (that is - the DR in DRM), and you decided to access the content.