Some things need correction. Using samples composed of overwhelmingly white university students in social research is hilariously and obviously flawed. In that sense, lacking inclusion is like ignoring gravity.
If you're shopping a general theory about morality that encompases Christian morality and non-Christian morality, I don't see what there's to be worked up about.
Unless you haven't actually explored the world beyond your backyard. I have typically found Haidt's moral foundations to be pretty interesting but because he's always sold it as cross-cultural. So this seems a bit odd, honestly.
Extremely likely to be a virtue-signaling publicly stunt, TBQH.
Imagine giving papers that described how they advanced Christendom priority.
Ironically, "saluting" DEI in academic papers has the opposite of the ostensibly intended effect.
Political alignment of professors favors the left by 9 to 1. If anything, favoring DEI will cement "academia's typical cronyism".