Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Which one? 2000? 2008? 2016? 2020?



I definitely remember a bunch of democrats being convinced that 2004 was stolen. Amusingly enough, they blamed Diebold too.

2000 is probably the one for which the strongest case exists, but people don't care about that one anymore.


If you remember Dems claiming that the 2004 election was stolen, then you should be able to remember that the tenor, tone, and energy level was radically different than the events of 2020, and it all went away much faster. For example, I don't believe any Democrat candidates ran an '06 or '08 campaign around the idea that the '04 election was stolen, something which is happening right now in a number of states.


I do. The real purpose behind that comment was to add the one election that the parent had not included.

I entirely agree that this is a completely different level of election fraud insanity.


I think they meant the one with the unprecedented violent riots in the Capitol that resulted in some folks dying. Could be wrong.


On the off chance you weren't aware, the story about an officer being bludgeoned to death by a rioter wielding a fire extinguisher was completely fabricated. [1]

He was uninjured during the riots, and died the following day of a stroke due to a preexisting blood clot. Kind of interesting the massive propaganda campaign following his death that was maintained for months, even though the coroner's report on his death would have been available within days of his death. And the powers that be obviously knew, whatever the cause, it had 0 to do with the lie that was told, and repeated for months by the media, to the American people.

The only people that died during the riot were unarmed rioters.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Brian_Sicknick


I am aware of that. No need for the data dump.

Unarmed rioters that were ignoring LEO instructions to stop trying to breach an area containing a number of politicians. There is every reason to believe that, had they breached, violence would have occurred. Acting as if their violent behavior was not the direct cause of their death just because they were unarmed is not reasonable, in my opinion.


[flagged]


I mean, what could I possibly say that would convince you that neither is the case? Probably nothing. I saw what I saw.


...

Are you seriously implying that the Jan6 riot didn't happen?

Despite all the video proof of it?

I'm starting to think "Trump Derangement Syndrome" actually is a thing, but it's not his detractors that have it, it's his supporters.


[flagged]


"The last election" was a valid statement in 2000 as it is today




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: