On: Climate change: Six tipping points ‘likely’ to be crossed

[ben_w]

> The laws of nature is not probabilistic

Today's your lucky day, you're one of the 10,000 who learn about quantum mechanics (fundamentally random) and chaos theory (sensitivity to initial conditions such that even classical mechanics might as well be fundamentally random) for the first time today:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

https://xkcd.com/1053/

Edit:

Also, p-values: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value

[ThomPete → ben_w]

I understand quantum mechanics very well which is why I understand that the Everett interpretation is how we move forward.

[ben_w → ThomPete]

Why do you then assert "The laws of nature is" [sic] "not probabilistic"?

[ThomPete → ben_w]

Because that's what the Everett interpretation deals with.