On: Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis

[igouy]

And the question I asked someone else was —

What would you accept as evidence of "no lab involvement"?

[seer-zig → igouy]

Not the poster you're responding to, but a start is to allow external investigation into the labs by a third party.

[igouy → seer-zig]

The only way that could resolve these questions is if evidence of lab involvement was found.

Not finding such evidence has WithinReason saying "There is also no evidence that the epidemic had no lab involvement."

one cannot prove that ghosts do not exist

[seer-zig → igouy]

There is enough reason to suspect something is going on though, especially that the CCP is known to lie and cover up.

[igouy → seer-zig]

> … something is going on…

Something not very mysterious —

2022 "Wildlife trade is likely the source of SARS-CoV-2"

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.add8384

2003 "Asymptomatic animal traders prove positive for SARS virus"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1140695/

----

The scary part is that there's every reason to expect this to happen again and again.