Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sure, if you're unloading from the donkey serially. But if you unloaded in parallel, no one donkey would be unloaded before the others.



That still delays when you can send the first donkey back - and it continues to eat.

If you unload from one and send back immediately, it eats 3 days, goes back.

If you unload in parallel, you cannot be sending a donkey back in 3 days, so you must be feeding extra donkey.

It still may get you an advantage overall, but it's not the maximum advantage.


very analogous to airplanes running on fuel vs batteries


I was actually thinking it was like the Falklands.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Black_Buck

The British were able to fly bombers from tremendously far away, with a chain re-fuel strategy where the re-fuelling tanker planes are themselves re-fuelled by other tankers which then turn back. Later iterations were optimised by thinking more carefully about who should transfer fuel, to who, and when, as in this example.

Arguably Black Buck was pointless, it was certainly not pivotal in the outcome of the war, but the actual process was fascinating.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: