Here goes.
What are the arguments _against_ open source?
What if someone says, "Open source means poor quality"?
You can look back on the last 15 years, choose some examples of open source software and rebut that with evidence.
I would make this rebuttal.
You apparently would as well.
Now, what are the arguments _for_ open source?
You could say "Open source produces high quality software." Note: Not "can produce" but "produces". As in always.
You could say that.
I wouldn't.
I wouldn't make that argument.
I would argue open source make sense because the source can be reviewed and corrected if necessary, without being dependent on a proprietary vendor.
Hope this is clear.
Here goes.
What are the arguments _against_ open source?
What if someone says, "Open source means poor quality"?
You can look back on the last 15 years, choose some examples of open source software and rebut that with evidence.
I would make this rebuttal.
You apparently would as well.
Now, what are the arguments _for_ open source?
You could say "Open source produces high quality software." Note: Not "can produce" but "produces". As in always.
You could say that.
I wouldn't.
I wouldn't make that argument.
I would argue open source make sense because the source can be reviewed and corrected if necessary, without being dependent on a proprietary vendor.
Hope this is clear.