> Hard cases make bad law. This is a hard case and we would caution anyone from seeing it as setting precedent.
OK, but you should be clear about the definition of hard cases.
What exactly constitutes "an emergency threat to human life"?
Hypothetical example: Suppose you're providing DDOS protection for a website belonging to country X, that acts against the interests of your country. War erupts between the two countries, and the website plays an important role in the information warfare by propagating fake news.
Would that constitute an emergency threat to human life since it helps perpetuate the war?
OK, but you should be clear about the definition of hard cases. What exactly constitutes "an emergency threat to human life"?
Hypothetical example: Suppose you're providing DDOS protection for a website belonging to country X, that acts against the interests of your country. War erupts between the two countries, and the website plays an important role in the information warfare by propagating fake news. Would that constitute an emergency threat to human life since it helps perpetuate the war?