Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Online services can only do so much due diligence. Do you want mandatory photo ID & facial verficiation instead? That would be infinitely more harmful to user privacy.



So now we're discussing implementation? Does that mean we've moved on from "this is a good idea"?


No one is walking down your path of false logic other than your own baseless assumptions.


Typical response from a sketchy party:

"Their document is full of misinformation!"

without actually naming any.


Maybe try presenting actual facts instead of tabling predisposed statements then proceeding to attack anyone who point out how awfully biased they were?


"Predisposed statements" isn't even a meaningful term in English.

It's an opinion. It's supposed to be biased.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: