> Guido, having clearly avoided any relevant literature […] unobservant of prior work
Same thing can be observed for his blog opinions on parsing. Sadly, this gives rise to a whole generation of programmers who believe (on account of perceiving him as an authority) that Peg are actually good.
Agreed. Unintentional ambiguities are a problem of PEG parsers. Ironically, the old Python parser also failed to detect ambiguities.
There is a strong aversion in the Python space for unambiguous formalisms. A parser that resolves ambiguities by earliest match first seems to satisfy the dynamic mindset.
Same thing can be observed for his blog opinions on parsing. Sadly, this gives rise to a whole generation of programmers who believe (on account of perceiving him as an authority) that Peg are actually good.