Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yes HN is typically the "it doesn't solve the problem perfectly so it shouldn't attempt to solve it at all" types. It really is a drag :|



Common trope everywhere honestly. Technology Connections speaks of it in the "but sometimes!" video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiYO1TObNz8 where LED lighting in traffic lights is meeting resistance¹ because sometimes it freezes/snows over. It's efficient, so no more heat to keep itself snow-free. Oh no, says the general public, we can't install that! Of course a little resistance heater is primitive technology, cheap to add, and it takes about two brain cells to realize that sometimes not being better than incandescent is still better than always using incandescent, yet still it's apparently a thing to work through. Not a problem exclusive to HN

¹ edit: I had not realized the irony here while writing this :-)


No. It doesn't solve the problem at all.

Billions of tons of carbon will need to be extracted from the atmosphere. But removing it will do no good as long as even more is released. 100kt/y is like breathing on somebody who is thirsty. Yes, there is moisture in your breath. No, it didn't help.

Creating a carbon tax such that emitting carbon costs as much as they spend extracting it, and then handing that over to extractors, could enable scaling up to the point where it could do some good.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: