Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It might have something to do with the high fidelity voice calling having a reasonably large bandwidth that you could theoretically use as a data channel - many times larger than an old v.92 modem. Maybe that's not so relevant these days with more people having unlimited data plans.



Why would the phone manufacturer care?

(And in any case, as you suggest most people pay more per bit transmitted on a mobile voice call than they pay per bit as data.)

Purely for fun, it would be interesting to hack up two smart phones to transmit data over a voice call. Presumably, you can keep everything binary, if you control the end-points.


That's how SMS works. It's running a baseband modem over the voice channel.


SMS is transmitted over digital signaling or transport channels. There was never any analog coding involved (except for a few retrofitted implementations on landlines in Europe).


That would give you a 128 kbit/s channel under absolute ideal conditions (the maximum bandwidth supported by the EVS codec).

Practically, you‘d be better off using a throttled (after exceeding the included data volume) native data connection.


I see. Yeah pretty terrible.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: