Any trouble with the Rust implementation? I wanted to give the book a go using Rust, but have been sitting on it because I don't want to get halfway through it only to find that Rust's intentional design and limitations might make it difficult to build an interpreter via the assumptions in the book.
You can do it pretty much verbatim, with dynamic dispatch using enums and lots of pattern matching.
It gets a bit trickier when you are nesting environments for closures and the like, but certainly nothing insurmountable without a few things from the standard library.
I've been loosely following the book with Rust, and no issues so far. Both the compiler and interpreter are implementable without much issues. You'll have to adapt a bit, but in general you can use the same methods.
Not really (for the first part at least, am not yet finished with the second part). I did deviate a little bit with my Rust implementation.
This was my goal anyway: implement Lox differently. Off the top of my head:
* I used ADTs to encapsulate error types and states as much as possible, this lead to heavy use of enums and pattern matching.
* I implemented the `Environment` as an immutable, explicitly passed value. This was a little challenging at first, but overall quite satisfying to do.
