It’s pure chaff when we are actually trying to have conversation and not write reddit/twitter gotchas.
In this case, the de-snarked version is a much better response and it leads to a conversation towards clarity. e.g. the author could respond to why the functions were changed.
The original snark doesn’t do that. It just casts judgement instead of seeking clarity. It’s childish and something I would do in my shameful Reddit-arguing days.
In this case, the de-snarked version is a much better response and it leads to a conversation towards clarity. e.g. the author could respond to why the functions were changed.
The original snark doesn’t do that. It just casts judgement instead of seeking clarity. It’s childish and something I would do in my shameful Reddit-arguing days.