Look, superficially I could list out ICO, IITA, AAPPI, and a host of other privacy and cookie-related laws and legal bodies. Anyone with Google can do that and it’s not really an indicator of expertise because listing things doesn’t mean I understand their content or their consequences.
Also recall, the jurisdiction you’re demanding was mentioned in my very first response to you: Europe.
What exactly is it that you’re trying to argue at this point?
> Look, superficially I could list out ICO, IITA, AAPPI, and a host of other privacy and cookie-related laws and legal bodies. Anyone with Google can do that
Yes, you could. No, you didn't.
> Also recall, the jurisdiction you’re demanding was mentioned in my very first response to you: Europe.
This is what you said: " I guard against presumption: so I don’t make references to forms of European legislation"
So no, you didn't make references to Europe, and you continued to vaguely describe some vague unknown jurisdictions.
> What exactly is it that you’re trying to argue at this point?
You could, of course, respond by pointing out legal frameworks or laws where the discussed cookie banner is actually required. And yet, here we are, in a pointless thread where you've pointed out none.
Also recall, the jurisdiction you’re demanding was mentioned in my very first response to you: Europe.
What exactly is it that you’re trying to argue at this point?