Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> so holding cash at 0% return is still better than negative returns from stocks

holding stocks as they go down in price does not necessarily matter. It only matters at time of sale. Selling an index (or a particular stock or set of stocks) as they go down only to buy them again later is not the right strategy... you're incurring transaction costs at the very least and the fact that you cannot time the market means you'll probably lose out even further.

Hold the index, unless you need the cash flow or forecast that you need more buffer for flexibility and don't want, in the short term, to be penalized for volatile stock prices (e.g. in case you need to sell to service some cash needs).

And if you have the cash, continue to buy the index on the way down. If your view is that the market, over the long term, is the best generator of wealth, then continuing to buy into it is the more rational strategy.

Inaction is sometimes the best action. There are more ways to be dead than being alive.




If you can sell 100 shares today and use that money to buy buy 200 shares in 6 months then you are better off than if you had held 100 shares for that same six months as long as you buy back into the market.

Actually trying to time the market is largely a fools game, but people do get lucky. Or more often realize they shouldn’t try and time the market.


Yah and if I could buy bananas today for $1 and sell them tomorrow for $5 I'd be fairly wealthy. And if my uncle was a monkey and my aunt a banana farmer we'd all be well off.


Yeah, except in six months you’d be thinking of waiting until you could buy 300 shares, and might miss the buying window entirely


Right. Hindsight is 2020 but that does not an investment strategy make.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: