Perhaps in this case. In the report I worked on though, a decent part of the report was in the vein of, "Even if party $X violated such and such as claimed, each of these damages that opposing expert enumerates is in fact much smaller for reasons $A, $B, and $C.
In this case, of course, it may well have been the case that the damages seemed reasonable if the company had indeed violated IP. So the lawyer basically made sure the jury knew the expert was paid but basically move on.
In this case, of course, it may well have been the case that the damages seemed reasonable if the company had indeed violated IP. So the lawyer basically made sure the jury knew the expert was paid but basically move on.