Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Induction stoves are quite efficient. Gas stoves, perhaps counterintuitively, are not. This is mostly because the considerable majority of the heat from the flame goes around the pot without heating it. (A pot on a grate is a terrible heat exchanger.) So it is not obviously a loss to burn gas to make electricity and then to use that electricity to cook. It may even be a win.

All of this ignores that electric cooking can use renewable sources and that gas fired plants can control NOx emissions.




I've been looking into replacing my terrible electric range with one that has induction burners. One consideration I saw when looking at comparisons was that electric and induction really require a flat bottom pan. If your pan is curved, you need gas to evenly heat it. So when it comes to something like a wok, you need gas. To eliminate gas is to eliminate the wok as a means of cooking.


For a wok, you need an actual electric wok, a special induction stove for woks [0] (of course this is a thing!), or gas.

On the flip side, if you have a mediocre pan with a thick base but thin walls, an induction stove won’t heat the walls the way a gas stove would, which will reduce burning.

[0] https://www.atcooker.com/products/commercial-induction-wok/ for example. I have no idea if this is any good.


Interesting. I wonder if the law makers are looking at the environmental cost of producing all these new cooktops vs using what has already been produced.

Kind of like the plastic Nalgene bottle you already own, and functions perfectly fine, is better for the environment than throwing it out to buy a new stainless steel bottle. Granted, the water bottle example doesn't require a fuel source for continued use.


Most of these laws are for new construction.


Sounds dire! But there are multiple solutions, and you can find a lot on the Internets about them.


> This is mostly because the considerable majority of the heat from the flame goes around the pot without heating it. (A pot on a grate is a terrible heat exchanger.)

I always wonder: Why aren't pots insulated? Just putting the lid on allows me to cut the flame ~~ 80%.


You want pots to conduct heat, not contain it. The closest comparison is cast iron which has a large mass, so heat ebbs and flows from it slowly (and, is more consistent).

Insulation would mean you have an even harder time transferring heat to the pot, so it's not only worthless, it's actively bad.


> Insulation would mean you have an even harder time transferring heat to the pot

Obviously, insulate the sides and top.


You don’t want insulation — you want a heat exchanger. This product is actually quite effective:

https://turbopot.com/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: