Still, why does it always have to be when they're doing something they shouldn't do?
...
Then I realized that they really have to do something, and I don't know exactly what the alternative is. If they gave them any compensation they would be admitting harming people and that could be a legal issue.
Edit: Oh, they are doing that, but are vague about it:
> We will apply our generous severance philosophy to offset the financial impact of this decision.
That's a pretty nice minimal way of saying it, and they probably will have a minimal approach of doing it as well, both to reduce the cost and risks.
The honesty is refreshing.
Still, why does it always have to be when they're doing something they shouldn't do?
...
Then I realized that they really have to do something, and I don't know exactly what the alternative is. If they gave them any compensation they would be admitting harming people and that could be a legal issue.
Edit: Oh, they are doing that, but are vague about it:
> We will apply our generous severance philosophy to offset the financial impact of this decision.
That's a pretty nice minimal way of saying it, and they probably will have a minimal approach of doing it as well, both to reduce the cost and risks.