Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If one is going to go into the effort and cost to put an SoC onboard that can run a touchscreen, one should just have the device communicate with the touchscreen computer in your pocket instead.

Common basic functions: knobs dials switches.

Extended functions: there's an app for that, or suffer through modal button changes like you describe.

Save on BOM costs, less points of failure, and does not require an SoC with display controller and a software stack running a (usually janky and slow and non-standard) UI.




This does happen on a lot of devices. It’s ok for stuff you expect to last a few years but anything longer and the app stops working before the device does.

I have a bike gps which has some functions as a phone app but the phone app no longer works.


Yeah, this is a potential downside but also an argument for open protocols and specifications for managing and controlling these kinds of devices.


This is an awful idea in practice. For example, an update to my Anova precision cooker required I logged in with a Facebook account to continue using it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: