> I see the problem is that people look at the output of these things that are (say) 70% correct and in their mind they fill in the other 30%.
Q: Is there also some element of survival bias in the mix?
If you prompt GPT-3 with something and the answer is garbage, you probably don't write it up on your blog. If you get something that makes sense, then you do.
Q: Is there also some element of survival bias in the mix?
If you prompt GPT-3 with something and the answer is garbage, you probably don't write it up on your blog. If you get something that makes sense, then you do.