I started programming around 1972 or so, so we are likely of similar vintage. I think we tend to find what we seek. I have found much to learn from Smalltalk and Lisp in the fifty years since I first wrote FORTRAN programs on punch cards at UofT's High-Speed Job Stream, and while yes, there are various people whose enthusiasm and narrow focus rivals any religious cult...
Here's the thing. Some people will hate a thing so much they'll accuse you of professional misconduct for using it. Seriously, you can find people who say, in writing, that programming without static type-checking is professional misconduct.
Should that stop us from using JavaScript, Clojure, Ruby, Python, &c.?
No. Although hey, at least read their arguments with an open mind and decide for yourself.
On the other side, there will be people who love a thing so much that they can't imagine using anything else. We may not love it as much as they do, but should that stop us from using that thing if we like?
Also no.
Bottom line: Why judge a thing by what the most extreme opinions about the thing are, or how extreme those opinions are? Judge by its utility for you.
Here's the thing. Some people will hate a thing so much they'll accuse you of professional misconduct for using it. Seriously, you can find people who say, in writing, that programming without static type-checking is professional misconduct.
Should that stop us from using JavaScript, Clojure, Ruby, Python, &c.?
No. Although hey, at least read their arguments with an open mind and decide for yourself.
On the other side, there will be people who love a thing so much that they can't imagine using anything else. We may not love it as much as they do, but should that stop us from using that thing if we like?
Also no.
Bottom line: Why judge a thing by what the most extreme opinions about the thing are, or how extreme those opinions are? Judge by its utility for you.