Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This isn't really relevant to the pocket watch problem. This only works because the bank doesn't care about over-committing a finite resource (mostly because they can charge you that fee). My company processes transactions for prepaid credit cards, so any money that is overdrawn is essentially lost - it's important to understand the characteristics of the problem and that there really is no magic anti-CAP bullet.



Exactly right. The bank example just demonstrates an alternative approach to full consistency.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: