Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Also, using .mp3 as DJ is unwritten crime.



> > DJ's should be paying for the music they're playing.

They are, separately from obtaining the material. Look up "performing rights" (which is specifically for songs; it's analogous for recordings, can't remember the exact name now).

> Also, using .mp3 as DJ is unwritten crime.

I would like to meet the person who can hear problems with well-encoded 320kbps mp3 when played in a crowded and noisy club.


The venue is responsible for acquiring performance rights. Not the DJ.


Authors get paid. The point stands, unless you want to argue that both the venue and the DJ should pay.


TL; DR: Music quality > Sound quality for me.

One DJ, Errorhead IIRC, recorded a track from a taxis stereo in colombia, crowd goes bonkers every time he plays it. I once had a DJ spinnin vinyl bore me to death, made me sad to think about how much he spent for those records. I much rather have bangin tunes in mp3 than that. Physically there might be a difference, mp3 filtering out stuff you "can't hear". Should affect the deep bass you can only hear and feel on a clubs PA.

I discovered awesome music in the worst quality you could imagine, midi files via a cheap soundcard. Even with plastic guitars, Led Zeppelin still sounds awesome.


I doubt you can tell the difference with lossy and lossless with a constantly clipping club sound system.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: