the sources the article cited are at best unverifiable, even quoting rumor mill directly to support their claims so it does feel quite strange and we can see why from the author's disclaimer:
"Clients and employees of SemiAnalysis may hold positions in companies referenced in this article."
So somebody seeks to benefit financially from selling the perception that Samsung is in trouble but feels an online disclaimer can shield them litigious Samsung lawyers.
"Clients and employees of SemiAnalysis may hold positions in companies referenced in this article."
So somebody seeks to benefit financially from selling the perception that Samsung is in trouble but feels an online disclaimer can shield them litigious Samsung lawyers.
This won't end well.