Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> there are other creative ways to compensate (stock, etc.)

People need to eat, lol.




What? Are we having the same conversation?

I'm saying is that focusing your energies on trying to get location based cheap labour might not be the best use of your time. How am I arguing that people should starve?


If you're building, and paying people in stock, then people can't trade that stock, and they can't buy food with it. So they'll go elsewhere where they get compensation they can buy food with.


Why is that a problem though? Businesses fail every day. Are you saying that paying less for 3rd world talent is going to make or break this business?

What I'm hearing is a bit contrived:

1. You only have enough cashflow to pay exploitative location based salaries. 2. You need talent (can't do it yourself). 3. You can't convince anyone to invest in it. 4. You can't attract talent with a low pay + ownership / stock deal.

Good luck I guess?


> What I'm hearing is a bit contrived:

I’ve literally no understanding of how you arrived at this list of things you’ve heard.


Paint me a picture then because I obviously have no idea and misinterpreted the point you are trying to make.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: