Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Do people really use copy-on-write filesystems though? I mean it'd be great if that were a default, but I rarely encounter them, and when I do, it's only because someone intentionally set it up that way. In 30+ years of using Unix systems, I can't even definitively recall one of them having a copy-on-write filesystem in place. Which is insane considering I used VAX/VMS systems before that and it was standard there.



FreeBSD uses ZFS by default, which is copy on write post-snapshot.


That's what I get for living in Linuxland for so long. BSDs tend to be so much smarter, but I'm stuck with Linux inertia.


So, use zfs on Linux.


I thought UFS was still the default with ZFS being a supported alternative option for root filesystems?


Huh? Btrfs is copy on write and it's definitely being used.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: