IANAL and I haven't read the filing. I'd assume, based on what I've read thus far (and the fact that it's a pretty standard initial response), that he'll file a motion to dismiss and go from there.
It seems plausible that he could have a decent chance of having such a motion granted -- the bar is generally "in the light most favorable to the plaintiff [Ubiquiti]". Based solely on the commentary I've read, it sounds like the complaint could be deficient.
It seems plausible that he could have a decent chance of having such a motion granted -- the bar is generally "in the light most favorable to the plaintiff [Ubiquiti]". Based solely on the commentary I've read, it sounds like the complaint could be deficient.