Agree, mostly. Primary care doctors in the US are often limited to 15-30 minutes per patient for routine matters. Referrals to nutritionists / dieticians and other expensive options often lack follow through, or aren’t offered in the first place because prescribing is so much easier. Medical professionals have a duty to arm patients with the information needed to make good choices about their health, but often shirk that duty due to inconvenience or these kinds of time limits. In a perfect world, access to medical professionals would be less scarce and at least the tools (nutrition info) would not be an issue. The medical system really isn’t designed for obese people on multiple levels in the US, and it isn’t designed for good long-term outcomes…yet.
Most systems, like Epic, will print out the standard info and counseling related to your conditions and medications when you get your paperwork at the end of the visit. That's easy and takes almost no time.
Considering the root(?) commenter said that a low carb diet did in fact work for them even though they had to go research it on their own, it sounds like it was effective.
There's no talk of completion. This isn't a "diet", it's a diet. We aren't using it as some colloquial meaning for losing weight, etc. This is about a lifelong dietary change to address excessive carbohydrate intake.
If it doesn't have "any effect" then I guess all type 1 diabetics are already dead?
The point still stands - doctors should be counseling diabetics on dietary changes, even if they are being prescribed medication. Some patients can improve their condition and overall health to the point that they can stop the medication. If you disagree with this, please, show me some sources. As for mine, you can check the AMA, AHA, ADA, and PubMed (American Medical/Heart/Diabetes Associations).
> Prescriptions of diet and exercise are ineffective
Which seems to be true. If any advice your doctor could give yields no measurable difference, is there really a point to giving it?