> I agree with FSF and OSI respective definitions of free software and open source.
> I also agree with their interpretation of BSD licenses and recognition as free software and open source respectively.
These seem to be in conflict here, as pointed out above, and your responses to my honest questions about this are not enlightening, in fact quite the contrary - you seem to be getting annoyed and are accusing me of having some sort of agenda.
> You're, of course, free to advocate whatever you want.
I'm not advocating anything. I'm certainly not advocating reclassification of any licenses. I'm not sure why this conversation is putting your back up so much.
> my end will not post further replies on this thread.
That's probably for the best, it seems to be upsetting you.
> I also agree with their interpretation of BSD licenses and recognition as free software and open source respectively.
These seem to be in conflict here, as pointed out above, and your responses to my honest questions about this are not enlightening, in fact quite the contrary - you seem to be getting annoyed and are accusing me of having some sort of agenda.
> You're, of course, free to advocate whatever you want.
I'm not advocating anything. I'm certainly not advocating reclassification of any licenses. I'm not sure why this conversation is putting your back up so much.
> my end will not post further replies on this thread.
That's probably for the best, it seems to be upsetting you.