> The risk is you’re going to build something and nobody will come (or stay), and then you’ll run out of money.
I feel like the author missed the letter in the middle, V. V=viable. So you build an MVP missing the viable. Yep, that's a risk. How does that bust the concept of MVP?
The author goes on to reason in circles several times, occasionally repeating some permutation of "it has to be viable", and "why didn't you start with something viable". "You're doing it wrong, you don't have the viable."
This person isn't ranting about MVPs. This person is ranting about startups that obviously do not have MVPs and are stabbing blindly at one.
I feel like the author missed the letter in the middle, V. V=viable. So you build an MVP missing the viable. Yep, that's a risk. How does that bust the concept of MVP?
The author goes on to reason in circles several times, occasionally repeating some permutation of "it has to be viable", and "why didn't you start with something viable". "You're doing it wrong, you don't have the viable."
This person isn't ranting about MVPs. This person is ranting about startups that obviously do not have MVPs and are stabbing blindly at one.