On: Minimal Viable Product is old and busted

[drewcoo]

This seems to be arguing that the complete implementation is what matters most.

That seems expensive and risky.

[izacus → drewcoo]

Yes, a complete, well-rounded implementation is what makes for a successful product (where well-rounded == supports use-cases for customers well).

It is expensive (which is why it costs a lot to create a startup) and it is very risky (which is why most startups fail because they mess this up).

[altdataseller → izacus]

Exactly, none of this stuff is easy. And it's not supposed to be easy and risk-free. Otherwise, anyone could build a successful startup/product