Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> The 964 different desktops available for Linux

83% of people are using just 4. Hell 65% are using just 2 and its the same 2 as in 2003.

https://linux-hardware.org/?view=os_de&colors=30

> slow impossible-to-use disasters

We are actually spoiled for choice if you just omit gnome 3. Mostly entirely usable

> even things in XFCE don't work well. (Example: network configuration, you need to be logged in as root to use this applet.)

This is like someone exclaiming loudly manual transmission cars are OK but how is everyone driving while sitting on that hard space between seats and reaching between their legs to shift. Well we aren't doing that. You don't need to log in as root to use the applet to configure your network options your system was just misconfigured probably because of something interesting you did manually.

Out of the box on basically every distro that isn't entirely do it yourself you see a little networking icon you click it and you connect to a network just like on windows.

> : I would like to point out that the Win2k desktop was blazing fast on a machine with 256MB of RAM. I can't get Debian to install on a machine with less than 512MB without complaining.

I cannot think of a worse metric of utility than ability to run well on amounts of memory that are found only in machines older than some people reading this forum. 4GB modules now cost as little as $17. Windows 2000 crashed, it leaked memory, it developed weird problems for no reason that could only be fixed by reinstalling. I don't miss any version of windows from this era.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: