Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Maybe I'm missing something but how does a newer version of the PCI-e spec directly lead to enormous benefits for a database that's running entirely in RAM?

In fact, on the surface, I would think that "traditional" databases (i.e., those residing on actual storage devices) would be more likely to benefit enormously as a result of this "upgrade" -- because of the massive increase in available bandwidth for storage and networking, of course.

--

(I'll certainly admit thatI don't follow or keep up with developments in new generations / iterations of Intel processors / hardware architectures, but I'm assuming that Intel's Xeon CPUs still access RAM via their own memory controller. Intel has definitely done (more than) their fair share of stupid shit over the years but I'm guessing they haven't recently decided that, now, the proper place for system memory is on the PCI-e bus!)




It's quite possible that in the near future, memory expansion will happen mostly over the PCI-e bus.

Vendors are moving towards bringing the main ram closer, to increase bandwidth, reduce power and reduce latency. However, this will necessarily mean that the amount of ram a CPU has will be fixed -- there will be no more dimm slots.

So what if you need more ram than the market provides on the top-end cpu? Samsung has your back, with CXL.memory. [0]

[0] https://www.anandtech.com/show/16670/using-a-pcie-slot-to-in...


Yeah nothing has changed after the late 2000s when the memory controller moved to the CPU die rather than the northbridge




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: